BOSTON — Wynn Resorts wanted to bring a little bit of Las Vegas to Everett. It proposed a five-star destination resort on the the site of a former chemical plant on the banks of the Mystic River.
Wynn Resorts won the competition for a casino license in Greater Boston. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission voted to approve Wynn’s casino in Everett over the one proposed for Revere by Mohegan.
Recent Casinos Coverage
- Map: See All The Casino Proposals
- 9/16/14: Wynn Plan In Everett Is Picked
- 9/8/14: Decision Time For Casino Panel: Mohegan Sun Or Wynn?
- 9/4/14: The Casino Repeal Effort Is Looking More Like A Long Shot
- 8/12/14: Expert On Market Saturation
- 7/14/14: 1 Way Mass. Casino Law Differs: Money For Neighboring Towns
- 6/24/14: Voters Can Decide Fate Of Casino Law, Mass. High Court Rules
- 6/13/14: Mass. Grants First Casino License To MGM Springfield
- 5/8/14: Crosby Recuses Himself From Eastern Mass. Casino Vote
- 2/27/14: Plainville Gets Slots License
Everett Mayor Carlo DeMaria, Jr. says he’s excited – that winning this bid will change the landscape of his city.
“It’s just going to be a big snowball getting bigger and bigger coming down the mountain, that’s what I see,” said DeMaria. “You won’t recognize the City of Everett hopefully in 10 years. It’ll definitely change. We’ll no longer be the butt end of the City of Boston, but we’ll be the entrance to the City of Everett.”
The state gaming commissioners – at least of majority of them – said that the Wynn casino would have a better economic impact for the Commonwealth than the one Mohegan Sun offered to build in Revere. They liked the Everett casino better, because Wynn promised to pay workers more and create more jobs. The commissioners also seemed swayed that the global gambling company is better positioned to draw high-rollers from abroad than Connecticut-based Mohegan, which might be more likely to cater to the local population.
But for all the talk of overall economic gains, the commission’s decision faces Revere with immediate losses. Mohegan‘s failed casino bid was paired with Suffolk Downs. The horse racetrack’s Chief Operating Officer Chip Tuttle said it’s impossible to survive after losing the competition.
“We are going to meet with our employees and the horsemen over the next couple of days and look at how we wind down operations in an orderly way,” Tuttle said.
That could amount to hundreds of employees out of work. They’ve been promised jobs at Everett’s casino, but it won’t be built for years. Many years, fears James McHugh, the lone gambling commissioner who voted for Mohegan’s casino bid. He says Wynn’s relatively worse relations with surrounding communities and a pending environmental cleanup means the project may take longer getting off the ground, lowering its value.
“Ultimately, I have a great concern about whether this project can muster the kind of collaborative energy it needs to move forward,” said McHugh.
Even so, McHugh was key in pressuring Wynn Resorts to pay more to the City of Boston, which is concerned over traffic impacts on Sullivan Square in Charlestown, which borders the Everett site. In response, Wynn agreed to raise its payments to up to $76 million over 15 years. But that was cold comfort to Mitchell Etess, the CEO of Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority who had the clear support of Boston Mayor Marty Walsh for a casino in Revere.
“We worked collaboratively. We had surrounding community agreements. We had host community agreements. And we worked very well,” said Etess. “We’re very proud of what we’ve done here. We’re very happy with the way we worked with everybody and wish it would have come out differently.”
Wynn Resorts executive Robert DeSalvio says his company is looking forward to working with Everett officials to build the $1.6 billion development.
“It’s a tremendous investment on behalf of the company,” said DeSalvio. “We certainly understand the responsibility that we have to our shareholders. And we look forward to moving forward on this incredible project.”
Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo, who’d hoped for a casino in his city, said he’s disappointed, but respects the decision of the gambling commissioners.
“They decided in this case to go risky versus safe,” Rizzo said. “I hope for the sake of the Commonwealth and for all those jobs that we’re going to be losing that that choice bodes well for everybody.”
It is, however, still up to everybody. No casino will get off the ground, in Everett or anywhere else in the Commonwealth, if Massachusetts voters decide to repeal the state gambling law in a measure on the November ballot. But if they don’t repeal the law, Everett is on track to get a casino, and Revere can only watch.